Beautiful mountains. Copyright Gary Higgins. eastcoast USA
cannot be used for commercial purpose.
INCREDIBLE MOUNTAIN TOPS,,, COPYRIGHT GARY HIGGINS
cannot be used for commercial purpose.
snowy mountain
snowless mountain
small mountain
beautiful hill
This website is endorsed by.....
Everyone that matters.....
feminists are primarily progagandists
Mt. Rushmore
--------
this is a bibiography of information.
-----------------------------------
Thom's comments on Nudity imposed upon boys:
"The real issue is the double standard. Is it a bad thing for either the boys or girls that are involved?"
That depends. Do you believe boys are people? Do their feelings matter? Is it conceivable that boys have feelings?
Based on your previous postings, you clearly view boys as subhuman creatures that exist to be abused. Lets review:
"It is good for a boys self esteem and assurance to be
>comfortable with being naked in front of girls with
cloths on. The boys mother should take every opportunity to arrange these type of encounters."
And if the boy objects to these encounters, too bad. It's not like boys have rights.
"Also, girls modesty must be protected and the girls education about boys anatomy is also important. The girls mothers should work with boys moms to help make it happen."
Sure, if a boy has to strip in front of girls at his mother's bidding, why not for his mother's friends and neighbors too? Boys are community property to be subjected to the whim of any random woman so inclined.
I've got to hand it to you. You don't just tolerate child abuse against boys, you advocate it.
**********
an absence of common sense
Ulterior Motive.
Political Bullying
Unfit Mothers to our children.
How people think.
Cause and Effect…
************
BOY BABIES
**********
Hi, I just happened to find this form. I find the double standard regarding male privacy is an interesting subject. I have to wonder why it occurs. Is it because women view men differently than themselves? How does this attitude prorogate? My wife is a nurse and she worked in the newborn nursery in a hospital. Part of her duties was to teach a class on proper care for newborns to the new parents. They always use a baby to demonstrate bathing and diapering techniques. She told me that they always use boy babies for the demonstrations. I asked her why only boys and she said it was the hospital policy because boys require more care than girls, but she also said that they found that the mothers were more comfortable with male genitalia shown in a group setting than they would be with female genitals. It seems like it start right from birth.
************************
oppression--- long version
************************
Hello, Okay, here's the problem. When people speak of Female Oppression, these words are merely spoken as an excuse to become totally attached with her, on an emotional scale. And that happens to be the END RESULT. You're showing total devotion toward women, whilst using "Oppression' as an excuse.
Also, Too many people see the world through literature, rather than observing real life. In our everyday lives, women tend to be socially privileged. But our 2-dimensional media says otherwise. therefore, most people trust the media more than their own personal experience. I probably shouldn't say this, but: in blunt terms: Women treat men like the Niggers of society. (example: When dating: she acts as though he's lucky to be with her.).
Also, most articles which make claims regarding 'women as victims' will ineveitable conclusion They always declare that women have special gifts and abilities. And the male is incapable of deriving the complex thoughts and emotions which are expressed by women. Also, there's always a few words regarding the fragile male ego. Which, of course, is prejudice against men. But of course, nobody ever cares.
When speaking of human sexuality, my views are unorthodox. I'm one of the few men who becomes offended when people describe how much I enjoy it. And, the whole idea that, she's God's greatest gift to men. It's amazing, How, I'm the only person on this earth who recognizes this arrogance on her part.
Finally, I consider myself to be the most progressive thinker of my generation. (I'm sorry if that sounds arrogant). Here's why I make this remark: When people speak of passages from the bible which are biased against women, this actually GIVES AN ADVANTAGE TO HER, NOT a disadvantage. Does that sound crazy? Consider this: It makes her seem like the innocent victim who can never be wrong. Plus, It forces people to always understand things from her perspective. In other words, we owe it to her. Moreso, It allows people to emotionally bond with her. Then, she's allowed to reference this information in order to make MEN look like dummies. So, it gives her the power to seek artificial vengence. Afterall, she's been given a convenient issue which can be used at her disposal.
Let's also consider the fact that Men are burdened with guilt and shame, each time a piece of ancient literature supposedly degrades women. As I've stated before: It really pays to be the victim. She's got no worries in the world. Basically, she wouldn't want things any other way. It's the perfect situation for every woman. This has more to do with Psychology than anything else. Humans tend to be debatists. And it all becomes a question of who's able to create the biggest fuss. This is why women always steer toward this narrow issue. the Eagles song said it best: "Victim of this, and a Victim of that". Essentially, this Dogma enables her to WIN every argument.
Now, with all said: consider how often the media displays bias against men. Each television station will victimize the male viewers several dozen times per day. Not to mention every sector of the media. Why then doesn't anyone complain about that. Maybe a possible answer lies with the bogus story of Lilith. She can always remind us how everybody is prejudice against her. Thus forcing everyone to totally agree with her, at all times.
And you must admit, people do feel entitled to devote their heart and soul toward Women. It's a non-stop celebration of Feminine Inner Beauty.
In realistic terms: the whole situation is 100% favorable for her. 0% for me.
sincerely, Danny....
************************
ORGANIZED NUDITY IS COMMUNISTIC
*****************************
Dr Dan Izzo Says:
May 25, 2008 at 25:25 am
BLAME IT ON ORGANIZED NUDITY
THE MORAL EROSION OF AMERICA:
WHY DID AMERICA FROM THE 1950S - 1970S FORCE BOYS TO SWIM NAKED ?
It was the Communists , in The Communist Manifesto
( a crime manual ) here is a quote from the Communist Manifesto:
” The Manifesto suggested a course of action for a proletarian (working class) revolution to overthrow the bourgeois social order and to eventually bring about a classless and stateless society, and the abolition of private property. ”
Well it worked, America is NOT going to be a Super Power for much longer, because of this bad policy..countries like Iran will develope WMD at a faster rate, and because America brain froze its thinking class , we’ll be passive and allow these criminals to streal top secret 75 year COPYRIGHT PROTECTED Data..even the A Bomb is United States Priority Date still.
Somehow the CIA through project Bluelbird ordered Schools to Force Students into Organized Nudity to Brain Freeze them.,
maybe under the idea that America would soon be leaving the Silver Standard and by Brain Freezing Students through organized nudity , civilization would accept valueless paper money as we have been since 1969-1970.
somehow the Communists Bribed the CIA through project Bluelbird , to force and degrade the thinking ability of America’s children:
here’s a quote from Wikipedia on Project Bluelbird
” BLUEBIRD was the cryptonym for a CIA program involving special interrogation methods, including the use of drugs, hypnosis,[1] and isolation. It lasted from 1949 to 1950 when it was renamed “ARTICHOKE”, and would eventually become the infamous MKULTRA. Responsibility for the project mainly lay with the Office of Scientific Intelligence. ”
The FBI’s J Edgar Hoover should have done something more to stop the Abuse of America’s children , even Psychoanalyssi education would ahve helped prevent the moral decay of the United States.
NOTICE THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL IS THE NEED FOR FOOD.
*******************************************
SAN PEDRO
25 YEARS AGO ON AMBERGRIS CAYE BY ANGEL NUÑEZ
What! Boys Naked on Streets?
Would you consider allowing your boys and girls walking naked on the streets of San Pedro playing some game in front of the house? You know, some people actually enjoy their boys in the home walking only in underwear, perhaps with a sleeveless vest on. But that is as far as we would go, not naked, and not on the streets.
You know, twenty five years ago, seeing a naked boy walking the streets of San Pedro was a common occurrence. Boys walked the streets naked up until about s even or eight years of age. There was one particular family from Belize City, the father was a shipwright, and those children walked naked until they were maybe ten or twelve years old.
Now don’t get me wrong. It was not like you see in some poverty-stricken areas of Africa as shown on film documentaries. Not everyone was going around naked. But there were several of them, so much that it was common, and seeing them caused no emotions. And the children themselves felt comfortable and did not bother that people were looking at them.
Boys walked naked in their yards, swam naked, and occasionally they were seen on the streets going some places as if they were sons of Adam and Eve. (But there were no Adams and Eves) Why was this so? Were they poor and could not afford clothing? No. Were they underprivileged? No. Was it too hot? No. Then what was the reason? It was custom as much as walking barefooted was a custom or men walking about with their pants rolled up half way up the knee, or their unbuttoned shirts. Yes, all of these were customs. You would find a man well dressed up going for a walk and his shirt would be unbuttoned. Some showed an undershirt. Others showed the big belly.
My parents say I never did. They did not enjoy that custom. However, I do remember being about six or seven, and after coming out of the sea, my mom, and sister would make us strip naked in the yard and put us (my brother and I) into the “batella” (the washing tub), and give us a good shampoo and scrubbing from head to toe. That was in the outdoor garage, and anybody passing by could see us naked, so we put up some crocus bags as curtains to keep off the public eye from this weekly ritual. This was a weekly ritual because mom thought we did not bathe properly, so the shampooing and scrubbing was done with plenty of water and plenty of soap. And no matter how much we cried because of the soap in our eyes, the scrubbing of the head continued until she was certain any possible threat of head lice was destroyed. At other times, when we came from swimming in the sea, we would go to the well in the middle of the yard and again strip naked and pour pails of fresh water over our bodies. This bath required no soap, for after two hours in the sea and five minutes of showering, what possible dirt could be on our bodies? But the point was that this shower was blank naked but only in our yards.
*********************************
COMPLIANCE
***********************************
-- That was an AWESOME response. and I fully agree. I too have a quotation of similar value: "In order to oppose someone's ideas, I shouldn't be required to 'partially' agree with them." ... And, as we've seen countless times, these Femme groups always seek ways to force compliance
***********************************
Muslim Boy
***********************************
Ahmadi Muslim Boy Expelled for Not Bathing Nude
PRESS RELEASE
NUDE BATHING
(Rashid Ahmad Chaudhry)
Hashim Ahmad, an eleven year old boy, was expelled from school a week after he joined the fee paying Friern Barnet Grammar School, North London, because he objected to participate in communal nude bathing after the P.E. and games session.
Hashim, son of Mr Rashid Ahmed of North London, said that he believed that Islam does not allow its followers to go naked in the company of others. Hashim's parents approached the headmaster of the school and tried to resolve the situation. They requested that their son should be allowed to take bath in swimming trunks, but the headmaster refused to give such permission.
During the first week at school when Hashim was forced to take a shower in the nude, he was so upset that he started to vomit when he reached home. His doctor, therefore, wrote a note to the headmaster asking him to reconsider his stand and find a compromise in the situation, but this request also fell on deaf ears.
The Muslim community of Great Britain is furious about the incident and is taking the case to the Race Relations Council.
The father of another Muslim boy, who also paid the fees, has withdrawn his boy from the school after his similar request was turned down by the headmaster.
The Imam of the London Moque, Maulana Ata-ul-Mujeeb Rashed, has issued a statement on the issue: "Communal nude bathing is completely out of the question for a Muslim. It is compulsory for all Muslims to cover the private parts of their bodies and make sure that these are never exposed to others at any time. It is incumbent upon every Muslim to adhere to these teachings and rules most faithfully and there is no room for any exception in it."
Mr Rashid Ahmad Chaudhry, the Press Secretary of the worldwide Ahmadiyya Muslim Association, when contacted remarked: "Compulsory group nude bathing in a school is a gross infringement upon the civil liberties of a child. Private parts are just what their name implies and are not for indiscriminate viewing by others, whether at a young age or old.I wonder why such a practice is allowed to continue in British schools when other dehumanising rituals such as corporal punishment have all been stopped. I wonder how in this modern age and in a multicultural society such as ours, a headteacher can force the youngsters in his charge to partipate in nude bathing. The sensible teachers who care for children have realised this problem and have dropped the requirement of having group showers in the nude, specially in the case of children who express their distaste for such a practice. However, regrettably, here is a headmaster who was obstinate enough in his approach to expel a young promising boy from school simply because he refused to take part in the parade of naked bodies."
Scanned from:
The Review of Religions
November 1988
Vol. LXXXIII No. 11
***************************
The 3 toddler boys are stripped naked, while the 2 girls maintain their dignity.
This should not be tolerated. These societies Must Change.
***************************
She's sincerely Inaccurate
***************************
Hi, I believe your intentions are very sincere. there's only one thing which I disagree with. regarding the 'Man's Role in family'. You see, I share the same viewpoints as MEL FEIT, from the National Center for Men. He believes that women have always had certain intangible privileges. And I fully agree with him.
Although there is one fault which abusive husbands ARE guilty of, all the rest are her doing.
And I hate to say this, but, most things which you've listed are clearly an aspect which men are victims of.
For example: he always accepts all responsibility for fault.
Only SHE throws objects across the room,
she blames her partner for everything, and not vice versa,
She discourages her husband from having friends, or being close with his family,
she never asks his opinions while expecting him to listen to her.
(in my opinion, this is the singular greatest quality which a woman seeks in a man.)
Only a woman is allowed to lose her temper,
Even the nicest ladies often call their husbands names (without even realizing it) (Not intentionally),
The woman deliberately gives the silent treatment. (admittedly, the man does this as well, yet his actions are inadvertent.)
Perhaps, worst of all, she reveals his secrets, whenever angered. For example: in a courtroom, ex-wives will speak of their former husbands in every way possible. Maybe, he briefly experimented with drugs, in the past. Or, perhaps, she'll reveal embarrassing sexual secrets.
Also, women make all the plans, without asking the husband. (although there's really no offense with this).
Obviously, men never play mind games.
Women typically drag unrelated issues into an argument.
Also, the woman NEVER admits to being wrong, EVER.
Finally, there is one aspect to domestic violence for which the man is totally at fault. There is no deep explanation to this. In fact, it could all be summed up in a singular word: ALCOHOLISM. Yup, over 80% of cases where the male is abusive can be attributed to this lone factor: excessive consumption of alcohol.
So, I admit, this particular problem does occasionally exist.
***********************************
FORCED LESBIANISM
************************************
ahhhhhh, you're missing the point: I'm giving it back to the Feminists. Don't you see? Everytime they make an outlandish claim, I follow up by making the same claim.
For example: "Every Man is a rapist".
SO, I throw the comment back into their faces and say that "Every Woman is a Rapist"...
But, I can actually substantiate that claim. Mothers typically keep their sons nude, while they clothe girls of the exact same age.
This is a WORLDWIDE epidemic. SO many countries practice this disgusting trait. And, Ironically, it trandscends culture, religion and race. SO, Religious women in the Philippines are guilty of it. SO, are Mexican Mothers, Cubans, Ultra Liberals, YOU NAME IT.. Eastern Europeans. Back in the 1970's, The Germans and British were known to practice this cruel double standard. And I was a victim of it.
Also, are you aware of the Forced Nudity Conspiracy. Female facilty Members spent decades forcing boys to swim Nude in Gym classes, all over the country. And their main reason for doing so, was to keep him subordinate, obediant, disciplines, complaint, and humiliated.
As for Forced Lesbianism, this happens to be Feminist Doctrine. they WILL have sex with other women, mainly to eliminate men from society. And, they formulate ARMIES, for the sole purpose of converting every woman into lesbianism.
This problem is REAL.
Also, if you go to any dating agency and People Search "Women Seeking WOmen", you'll QUICKLY notice that many women are trying to PUSH other women to quickly engage in sex, without any waiting period. In other words, they're handling things in the exact opposite manner as heterosexuals, who tend to take things more slowly...
***************************************
THE WAR AGAINST BOYS
***************************************
posted by THOM, he's truly brilliant
****************
There is something like a 50% divorce rate in America and in something like a 95% of those cases, the ex-wife is given custody of the children. Why? Because they're women.
The boy goes from his matriarchal home to a school which is also dominated by women and a child care center which is all women.
A girl who acts up is congratulated for her assertveness while a boy is prescribed ritalin.
Nursing, as you point out, is also female dominated and any boy who comes under a nurse's control will be treated with less respect than a girl.
****************************************
WOMEN ONLY EXERCISE .. these institutions were created by those same individuals who brought lawsuits against men's clubs.
[Eugene Volokh, March 6, 2008 at 7:21pm] Trackbacks
Single-Sex Exercise:
I blogged yesterday about why I think women-only exercise hours at a Harvard pool don't violate Massachusetts law. I'm inclined to also think that they don't violate Title IX, because they don't deal with discrimination in educational activities. It's not clear whether an accompanying requirement that the attendants working at the pool during those hours be women would violate employment discrimination law; that turns on whether sex is a bona fide occupational qualification in that kind of situation, a matter that is not certain.
But I want to briefly touch on the broader policy questions: Should it be illegal for various organizations — whether health clubs generally or exercise facilities at universities — to provide single-sex exercise facilities? I'm inclined to say the answer is no.
1. To begin with, antidiscrimination law, especially as applied to nongovernmental entities, imposes substantial governmentally coerced burdens on liberty and choice, both of businesses (and similar nonbusiness entities) and of would-be patrons. In this kind of situation, the burden is chiefly on those people (men and women) who prefer single-sex exercise over mixed-sex exercise. That's a serious cost of any such law. This cost may be outweighed by various benefits, but we shouldn't forget the cost, nor just categorically assume that nondiscrimination based on various attributes must inherently be the rule everywhere.
2. In particular, I think the case for banning sex discrimination in places of public accommodation is fairly weak. Such discrimination rarely has major effects on people's lives, economic opportunities, educational options, and the like. Federal public accommodations law doesn't ban sex discrimination; state laws in Kentucky, South Carolina, and possibly Nevada (plus likely other places — I just took a quick look) don't, either. Whatever problems men or women may face in those states, I doubt that they stem from rampant discrimination in public accommodations based on sex.
In some situations, public accommodations discrimination based on sex may affect economic opportunities; this was a major argument for banning sex discrimination in clubs and social organizations that could be used for networking. I'm not sure that this is reason enough to ban such discrimination — people network over dinner with acquaintances, in church, and for that matter in bed, but that isn't reason enough to ban discrimination in socializing, religion, and sex. But even if one does think that some clubs should be required to open up to women as well as men, perhaps because government coercion in club socializing isn't as harmful to rights of association as government coercion in nonclub socializing (and because such coercion is needed to reduce economic barries to women), that should be the exception, not the rule.
Little harm is caused when, say, a hair stylist wants to serve only women (or only men), or a family lawyer wants to specialize in representing wives rather than husbands, or a bar offers a ladies' night discount to bring in more women (and thus indirectly help many of its male patrons). And a good deal of harm to individual choice is caused by banning such discrimination.
HA HA HA, NOTICE HOW THE HIPPIES FULLY SUPPORT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MEN
**********************************************
feminine togetherness in encouraged. Exclusion of Males
***********************************************
Sequel level of gender inequality, based solely upon this issue alone. And it’s almost as if they blatantly exhibit these strong bonds to one another. During my high-school years, nearly every girl would advertise the whole idea of her ‘feminine togetherness’. It was her way of establishing social inequality over her male counterpart. And I would constantly point this fact out to many other boys, whilst trying to explain Without question, both parents should have equal custody. For those who argue that a child belongs with its mother: this is a purely sexist remark. Additionally, the popularity of women’s talk-shows and magazines only proves our mothers are irresponsible parents. More so, Liberals claim that equal- observing the typical friendships amongst women: it’s easy to realize there’s a se, based solely upon this issue alone. And it’s almost as if vere level of gender inequality, based solely upon this issue alone. And it’s almost as if they blatantly exhibit these strong bonds to one another. During my custody would togetherness’have Upon observing the typical friendships amongst women: it’s easy to realize there’s a severe level of gender inequality exaggeration
*********************************
SHUT UP,. SHUT UP
************************
,,,, there's no reason to accept either position. Basically, in relationships, there shouldn't be any issues. there's no such thing as equality, or domination. neither. Most couples live very complex lives.
*************************
THE TRUTH
*(**********
, There's a bottom line to this whole saga. The social Privileges which exist for women are truly immeasurable. I'm not saying whether that's good or bad. (by the way, I'm aware that the media tells us a much different story, suggesting that women are negatively stereotyped, etc. etc. But their claims are completely false).
Women are given countless intangible advantages, in our everyday society. THis issue serves as merely a few indications, stemming from a much broader scale.
*************
****************
COnvenient issues at her disposal
***********************
Honestly speaking, one primary form of inequality rests with the fact, that, women have these convenient issues at their disposal. This offers a great deal of 'verbal control' to the woman. In other words, women are given the power-of-argument, which can be used to during any debate. Thus, you always come out the 'winner'.@@@@@@@@@@@@
**********
JAPAN Myth
**********
Actually, the concept of privilege is often merely a matter of personal opinion. In the case of Japan, a lady greets a Business Man, then proceeds to disrobe him, and make him comfortable. I actually interpret this as an element of control on her part.
Plus, in a more erotic term, the women there might enjoy pleasing the men. THis too gives an element of power and trust for her sake. I don't wanna go into extreme details with that paragraph. But, the female role demands willingness, and openness from the male.
There's even a slight comparison to a "mother figure" bathing the uninhibited male.
Finally, Japanese men have always made long commutes to and from their work. Often requiring them to work out-of-town for much of their lives. And that's certainly not a good life.
Give me the children and a sunny day at the beach.
****************************
Articles pertaining to "equality" are actually biased agianst men
****************************
You people really make me laugh.
YOu dig into some remote archive, claiming justification for being angry.
You should open your eyes.
RIGHT NOW, there is an entire media campaign targeted against males. Why would you be interested in showing something which is supposedly biased against women?
YOu should take a good look around. there are nearly infinite examples of media bias against men.
So, what's everybody's problem?
On similar terms:
Is it not true, the Feminists have been trying to remove men from the family unit?
So, why are you daring to talk about 'bias' which is supposedly against women?
I could give countless examples of bias against men.
**********
another awesome post from THOM
**********
I define it as having one standard of privacy for females and a different standard, usually lower, for males.
Examples are female "chaperones" for male patients, female reporters in male locker rooms, mandatory nude swimming for boys in school, teenage girl babysitters giving boys a couple of years younger baths, moms taking sons into men's changing rooms... and the list goes on and on.
I fail to see how respecting privacy equally for both sexes is a double standard.
Thom summed it up best. There exists a special relationship among family members. There are special rights, of course, but there are also special boundaries.
When the man I wrote about above, the one who managed to avoid having a female relative shave him for surgery, he
was criticized on several different levels.
But you said it right. There are boundaries between us and our relatives. He evidently decided that this was such a boundary, one that he did not want to cross.
The only question I had then, and I still do, is why the female nurse-relative was so willing to cross that same boundary. She seems to have gone out her way to do so.
***************
GODS, GODDESSES, and CELEBRITY RECOGNITION
***************
When male celebrities are recognized, their merits are individual. But, you'll notice, Actresses seem to represent 'women'. this might explain why the male audience is often alienated from them.
Men are accused of being biased against famous women. However, there's some degree of just reason for it.
Also, there's an interesting point regarding famous males, such as Elvis, and The Beatles. You'll notice, women go absolutely love-struck for these guys. Hmmmm. It suggests that the woman is every-bit physically attracted to the opposite sex.
you may or may not notice, prevailing dogma says that men are more attracted to women than vice-versa.
This is actually a very important issue. I can speak from personal experience. Everytime I have a steady girlfriend, I'm always "Lucky" to be with her. that's not so terrible, but still, worth mentioning.
Anyway, this gives some indication as to the type of detailed issues which I discuss.
Things often based upon reality.
wheeew. I always write too much..
sincrely, david.
Oh , I forgot to answer your question: the greatest privilege to being a woman, or a mother, is the fact that people truly recognize her, sincerely from the bottom of our hearts. So, we really look up to her, with the highest regards. And WE would never wish to dispute it. ....
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Legion- Agent 009000 [[ i am the revolution ]]
Date: Sep 2, 2008 6:45 PM
"SO, the Worship of One God is Not a manifestation of manhood, nor is it a celebration of Males."
agreed. but when a person says, for example, i worship Parvati or Durga, they are looked down upon. so im wonderin if motherhood is glorified why isnt that acceptable?
When male celebrities are idolized, their merits are individual. But, you'll notice, Actresses seem to represent 'women'. this might explain why the male audience is often alienated from them.
Men are accused of being biased against famous women. However, there's some degree of just reason for it.
Also, there's an interesting point regarding famous males, such as Elvis, and The Beatles. You'll notice, women go absolutely love-struck for these guys. Hmmmm. It suggests that the woman is every-bit physically attracted to the opposite sex.
you may or may not notice, prevailing dogma says that men are more attracted to women than vice-versa.
This is actually a very important issue. I can speak from personal experience. Everytime I have a steady girlfriend, I'm always "Lucky" to be with her. that's not so terrible, but still, worth mentioning.
Anyway, this gives some indication as to the type of detailed issues which I discuss.
Things often based upon reality.
wheeew. I always write too much..
sincrely, david.
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Legion- Agent 009000 [[ i am the revolution ]]
Date: Sep 2, 2008 6:45 PM
"SO, the Worship of One God is Not a manifestation of manhood, nor is it a celebration of Males."
agreed. but when a person says, for example, i worship Parvati or Durga, they are looked down upon. so im wonderin if motherhood is glorified why isnt that acceptable?
Oh , I forgot to answer your question: the greatest privilege to being a woman, or a mother, is the fact that people recognize her, truly from the bottom of their hearts. So, we really look up to her, with the highest regards. And we would never wish to dispute it. ...
.THE CONVERSATION GOT ALITTLE OUT OF HAND, and developed into a confrontation.
anyway, to answer your question:
Because they are NOT worshiping a deity in the form of a woman. Rather instead, the overall focus is upon women. For example: if you search Myspace for Goddesses, you'll quickly see, there's a total emphasis upon women. For example: I found one such profile which featured 60 pictures which were totally female-centric. And, yes, these photos celebrated all women as "Goddesses". Have you ever heard of the term "Diva". BUT, you don't need to take my word for it. Go, search for yourself.
Also, you're suggesting that someone is considered insane, immoral, horrible for daring to break conventional stereotypes. Ahhhhh, it seems , women always steer into this direction. No matter how many times males are insulted by the media, this never stops women from claiming it is they who are stereotyped.
Here's my story: until I was 16 years old, I spent most of my free time reading women's magazines. And, I'll say for certainty, these magazines produced countess examples of bias remarks. therefore, it is the male who is vilified by society, not the woman. Check out my blog, `100 examples of bias against men..
sincrely, David.
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Legion- Agent 009000 [[ i am the revolution ]]
Date: Sep 2, 2008 9:25 PM
my question wasnt 'whats the privealage of motherhood'.
why are people who worship a female diety looked down upon as insane/immorale/horrible people if motherhood is so glorified?
Fathers-4-Justice: Delaware …AND Everywhere, U.S.A.
Because they are NOT worshiping a deity in the form of a woman. Rather instead, the focus is upon women. For example: if you search Myspace for Goddesses, you'll quickly see, there's an overall emphasis upon women. For example: I found one such profile which featured 60 pictures which were totally female-centric. BUT, you don't need to take my word for it. Go, search for yourself.
Also, you're suggesting that someone is considered insane, immoral, horrible for daring to break conventional stereotypes. Ahhhhh, it seems , women always steer into this direction. No matter how many times males are insulted by the media, this never stops women from claiming it is they who are stereotyped.
Here's my story: until I was 16 years old, I spent most of my free time reading women's magazines. And, I'll say for certainty, these magazines produced countess examples of bias remarks. therefore, it is the male who is vilified by society, not the woman. Check out my blog, `100 examples of bias against men..
sincrely, David.
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Legion- Agent 009000 [[ i am the revolution ]]
Date: Sep 2, 2008 9:25 PM
my question wasnt 'whats the privealage of motherhood'.
why are people who worship a female diety looked down upon as insane/immorale/horrible people if motherhood is so glorified?
----------------- Original Message -------
****************
Double standard in Male Nudity. She often says, SO What?
**************
On 08/07/08, Kathy said
“OK, it's a double standard. So what? Why not just act like a man and take it!”
Hi Kathy, firstly, you're a Meaaaan woman !
Although , I do accept the terms of my physicals, we're just looking for alittle tact, on the part of everyone.
So, you could choose these words instead, “Hey, I know it's embarrassing for you guys. But, just remember, treatments and medicine can save your lives. So, sometimes, the detailed examinations are necessary.” “I realize it's difficult for men, gut, bear with it”.
Okay, that would be a more tactful approach.
Instead, most ladies always say, “Too bad, get over it”.
This same rule applies to everything else involving nudity.
1) boys were Forced to swim nude, and lift weights nude at many schools.
Answer: most women say: Get over it.
2)cleaning ladies walk into men's rest rooms without knocking, and nurses often casually interrupt physicals which she is not participating in.
Answer by most women: “Take it like a man”.
3)nurses give physicals, but they don't fully close the drapes.
Answer most women say: “Too bad, you big cry baby”.
4)college girls sometimes run into the boys shower room. It's a “girls will be girls” sort of thing.
Most women respond: “what's the matter, can't you take it? Are you afraid she's gonna find out your weenie is small?” “and you guys are also too fat”.
5)boys in high school receive communal physicals, while the drapes are partially opened, and the doors are rarely locked.
Women respond by saying: “You're a big cry baby”.
6)Not long ago, moms would take their children to a public swimming pool. But the moms would neglect to bring a suit for her sons. Therefore, he's told to swim naked, in front of everyone.
Her response: “It's no big deal”. “they're just boys”. “and besides, we've all seen one, before”.
7)back in the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's, men's locker rooms have always been indirectly accessible to women. Moms sometimes helped their toddler sons change, but there was a risk that an adult male would accidentally be seen. Or, When a female shaperone helped the children change their clothes, she would always forget some article of clothing. In which case, several minutes later, she simply walked into the Male locker room to retrieve it. And, by that time, the men were already changing.
Her response: “Don't worry, we're not interested in looking”.
7b) most people don't realize, Female affiliates have always freely visited men's lockers. Mothers, wives, cleaning ladies, launderers, and the immediate families of staff and management.
Common response: “Every adult woman can handle this maturely. it's no different than is she was your mother.”
8)worst of all: Government doctrinated court-orders legally permit women to freely roam into men's lockers. This truly is disgusting. Now, it's one thing for a lady to walk in, for good reason. Perhaps, she's on the medical staff, tending to a wounded athlete. Or, she's a professional trainer, employed by the sports owner, who really feels that she needs to be there. But, it's entirely different when this becomes government sanctions by court order. This truly is an outrage when reporters can enter, without being prevented.
The common response: “If you don't like it, then throw a towel on it.” Boy, that's an insulting response
10)mothers often walk into the men's room, because she very well can't take her boy into the ladies room. (Ummm, why can't she? The Ladies rooms always contain individual stalls. Therefore, it makes sense for a child to accompany it's mother, in the LADIES room. NOT the men's room).
Common response: “TOO bad, if you don't like it”. Gee, that's very blunt.
11)When a boy changes his clothes, the mothers and female guardians are often present. Then, when he'd old enough to be alone, the females still walk in, without knocking. When a mother changes her son's clothing, she usually leaves the door half-open. This can often be observed by all.
Common answer: get used to it.
12) Female principals Strip-search boys, merely because he skips class. Female guards watch the male inmates while they shower. Orphanages permit Female staff to freely walk into the boys locker rooms, and bathrooms.
Answer: “But it's necessary”. “They must perform these duties”. Okay, at least, this is somewhat of a rational and tactful answer.
13)
REPEAT VERSION:
Answer: most women say: Get over it.
2) cleaning ladies walk into men's rest rooms without knocking, and nurses often casually interrupt physicals which she is not participating in.
Answer by most women: “Take it like a man”.
3) nurses give physicals, but they don't fully close the drapes.
Answer most women say: “Too bad, you big cry baby”.
4)college girls sometimes run into the boys shower room. It's a “girls will be girls” sort of thing.
Most women respond: “what's the matter, can't you take it? Are you afraid she's gonna find out your weenie is small?” “and you guys are also too fat”.
5) boys in high school receive communal physicals, while the drapes are partially opened, and the doors are rarely locked.
Women respond by saying: “You're a big cry baby”.
6) Not long ago, moms would take their children to a public swimming pool. But the moms would neglect to bring a suit for her sons. Therefore, he's told to swim naked, in front of everyone.
Her response: “It's no big deal”. “they're just boys”. “and besides, we've all seen one, before”.
7) back in the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's, men's locker rooms have always been indirectly accessible to women. Moms sometimes helped their toddler sons change, but there was a risk that an adult male would accidentally be seen. Or, When a female shaperone helped the children change their clothes, she would always forget some article of clothing. In which case, several minutes later, she simply walked into the Male locker room to retrieve it. And, by that time, the men were already changing.
Her response: “Don't worry, we're not interested in looking”.
7b) most people don't realize, Female affiliates have always freely visited men's lockers. Mothers, wives, cleaning ladies, launderers, and the immediate families of staff and management.
Common response: “Every adult woman can handle this maturely. it's no different than is she was your mother.”
8) worst of all: Government doctrinated court-orders legally permit women to freely roam into men's lockers. This truly is disgusting. Now, it's one thing for a lady to walk in, for good reason. Perhaps, she's on the medical staff, tending to a wounded athlete. Or, she's a professional trainer, employed by the sports owner, who really feels that she needs to be there. But, it's entirely different when this becomes government sanctions by court order. This truly is an outrage when reporters can enter, without being prevented.
The common response: “If you don't like it, then throw a towel on it.” Boy, that's an insulting response
10) mothers often walk into the men's room, because she very well can't take her boy into the ladies room. (Ummm, why can't she? The Ladies rooms always contain individual stalls. Therefore, it makes sense for a child to accompany it's mother, in the LADIES room. NOT the men's room).
Common response: “TOO bad, if you don't like it”. Gee, that's very blunt.
11) When a boy changes his clothes, the mothers and female guardians are often present. Then, when he'd old enough to be alone, the females still walk in, without knocking. When a mother changes her son's clothing, she usually leaves the door half-open. This can often be observed by all.
Common answer: get used to it.
12) Female principals Strip-search boys, merely because he skips class. Female guards watch the male inmates while they shower. Orphanages permit Female staff to freely walk into the boys locker rooms, and bathrooms.
Answer: “But it's necessary”. “They must perform these duties”. Okay, at least, this is somewhat of a rational and tactful answer.
13) END END
I honestly fail to see why women should expect private showers, while men
>are supposedly ok with the communal shower thing. Especially given that in
>my experience, men tend to be more violently worried abo
************
WHO's TO BLAME
*************
when a girl spies on boys naked, she is more likely to make insulting remarks which degrade his body...
I was probably most disturbed by the insensitivity. Perhaps, if the ladies had chosen their words differently, it would've been more understandable.
This next paragraph might get alittle off topic: IT seems most ladies promote this whole idea "girls are not really the least bit interested in seeing boys". But instead, it's just funny. Afterall, who would ever be interested in guys, anyhow? WOmen of every generation claim to be totally disinterested in the opposite sex. That's somewhat embarrassing. While at the same time, the male is stereotyped as being very attracted toward the opposite sex. THis stigma gives alot of power to the woman.
Also, just for the record: the same rules should apply for both genders. Men are primarily interested in Love and relationships. Of course, everything else is secondary. I'm not happy being in the role where "males are more interested in females, than vice versa. " ...Actually, most men seek a wonderful personality. That's the real reason why men choose "sexy" women. It's NOT for their looks or body. As a matter of fact, we don't need to gaze at the female body for more than 3 minutes. Yea, it gets boring real quick. Also, I could be insulting too, by saying that most women's bodies are "odd-shaped" "flawed", "imperfect", and "funny Looking". But, that wouldn't be right.
Anyway, this Forum should focus upon a forced system which was borderline lunacy. IT certainly wouldn't be valid to hold personal grudges against anyone. Considering the circumstances, her actions were understandable. Okay ladies? You're all perfectly okay with me.
I wonder why these ladies would spend 600 POSTS trying to prove that the whole thing was "no big deal". It seems rather odd to me. they are putting other males at a status of lesser dignity. or, boys aren't taken seriously. That's perhaps what this whole issue is really about.
Anyway, Although, Yes, these incidents took place ages ago, but there's still a negative attitude resounding in these forums. So, It's a matter of principle.
REPEAT REPEAT
***
IT seems most ladies promote this whole idea "girls are not really the least bit interested in seeing boys". But instead, it's just funny. Afterall, who would ever be interested in guys, anyhow? Women of every generation claim to be totally disinterested in the opposite sex. That's somewhat embarrassing. While at the same time, the male is stereotyped as being very attracted toward the opposite sex. THis stigma gives alot of power to the woman.
Also, just for the record: the same rules should apply for both genders. Men are primarily interested in Love and relationships. Of course, everything else is secondary. I'm not happy being in the role where "males are more interested in females, than vice versa. " ...Actually, I should state the real reason why men choose "sexy" women. It's NOT for their looks or bodies. This type of woman happens to have the best personality. As a matter of fact, we don't need to gaze at the female body for more than 3 minutes. Yea, it gets boring real quick. Also, I could be insulting too, by saying that most women's bodies are "odd-shaped" "flawed", "imperfect", and "funny Looking". But, that wouldn't be nice.
Anyway, this Forum should focus upon a forced system which was borderline lunacy. IT certainly wouldn't be valid to hold personal grudges against anyone. Considering the circumstances, the actions of many girls were understandable. Okay ladies? You're all perfectly okay with me.
***********
CENSORED CENSORED CENSORED
***********
I think, it's time that you go out and get a REAL JOB. Instead of wasting our time, trying to prove that Feminist Propaganda is justified. This is the usual technique used by Feminist Pigs. You rummage through literature, searching for an example of 'bias against women' which can be used to your advantage.
In fact, the information which you've so happily submitted, indeed, acts as a convenient 'battle cry' for women.
Now, let me challenge your silly-ass dogma. Firstly, there are literally 100 million examples of female chauvinistic remarks plastered throughout the media. I grew up, reading roughly 2,000 Women's magazines. So, I've personally seen the true extent of this problem. Now, if you observe the 20,000 Feminist books which smother our book-shelves, their insults against men are everywhere, throughout every disturbing page. Yet, nothing has ever been said about it.
Also, I'm a TRUE advocate of Equality between the genders. During my childhood, I refused to spend a great deal of time chatting with my mother. Indeed, you'd never see me, greeting her with a hug. Plus, I recall,when My grandmothers would try talking with me. I would simply get up, and walk away from them . YUP, that's MY BRAND of 'Social Equality'. I've always realized that such issues weigh far heavier than your childish antics. You can't simply claim that men have always been privileged, just because men have always been the primary workers. How exactly does this figure? People claim that males have dominated society, just because they were forced to work for a living. Give me a break !! I've really had enough of your garbage, lady.
I also wonder, why haven't you been fired for displaying such unprofessional ethics. The reason is simple: You can, pretty much, get away with anything, just because you're a woman. yet despite that fact, you still try to prove there's some sort of horrible stereotype against women. WHy are you trying to make this point? Okay, let's never mind whether or not there's any tangible issues. Rather instead, let's deal with the psychological aspect of it all. You've got no reason to complain. So, why do you steer toward this direction? The reason is simply because: You wanna be part of this type of arrangement. DOes this really sound so strange?
Here's a few basic words regarding the issue of alleged stereotypes against women: You really WANT these dogmatic issues to exist. And, that's the truth.
If you've got problem, LET'S TALK. But, I'm really fed up with this garbage.
REPEAT
Hi Bonnie, I think, it's time that you go out and get a REAL JOB. Instead of wasting our time, trying to prove that Feminist Propaganda is justified. This is the usual technique used by Feminist Pigs. You rummage through literature, searching for an example of 'bias against women' which can be used to your advantage.
In fact, the information which you've so happily submitted, indeed, acts as a convenient 'battle cry' for women.
Now, let me challenge your silly-ass dogma. Firstly, there are literally 100 million examples of female chauvinistic remarks plastered throughout the media. I grew up, reading roughly 2,000 Women's magazines. So, I've personally seen the true extent of this problem. Now, if you observe the 20,000 Feminist books which smother our book-shelves, their insults against men are everywhere, throughout every disturbing page. Yet, nothing has ever been said about it.
Also, I'm a TRUE advocate of Equality between the genders. During my childhood, I refused to spend a great deal of time chatting with my mother. Indeed, you'd never see me, greeting her with a hug. Plus, I recall,when My grandmothers would try talking with me. I would simply get up, and walk away from them . YUP, that's MY BRAND of 'Social Equality'. I've always realized that such issues weigh far heavier than your childish antics. You can't simply claim that men have always been privileged, just because men have always been the primary workers. How exactly does this figure? People claim that males have dominated society, just because they were forced to work for a living. Give me a break !! I've really had enough of your garbage, lady.
I also wonder, why haven't you been fired for displaying such unprofessional ethics. The reason is simple: You can, pretty much, get away with anything, just because you're a woman. yet despite that fact, you still try to prove there's some sort of horrible stereotype against women. WHy are you trying to make this point? Okay, let's never mind whether or not there's any tangible issues. Rather instead, let's deal with the psychological aspect of it all. You've got no reason to complain. So, why do you steer toward this direction? The reason is simply because: You wanna be part of this type of arrangement. DOes this really sound so strange?
Here's a few basic words regarding the issue of alleged stereotypes against women: You really WANT these dogmatic issues to exist. And, that's the truth.
If you've got problem, LET'S TALK.
*********************************
A FIGHT BETWEEN MEN's GROUPS AND WOMENS GROUPS
*****************************
But here’s the main issue: You're a 20 year old woman, who grew up into an environment where Feminists were flooding the media. And it has thoroughly brainwashed people into accepting Feminism as an “everyday” word. So, in short terms: the media controls your thought-process.
Now, here’s the 2nd point: Men’s groups, such as MEN.Now, The National Center for Men, and Angry Harry, DON’T use theatrics to get their point across. In contrast, women’s groups use “IMAGERY” and “catchy sayings” to make their statement. That’s the point. Every Feminist site does the same exact thing.
okay,, this issue is NOT about men, and it's NOT about women...
It's about something far more important....
it's about the vast control which the media has over our lives.
************
A WOMAN's NEEDS
*************, this is a typical example of sexisme against men. In a sense, you're correct. Although women have strong sexual needs, most of them try desperately to do without it. Therefore, many guys are forced to decide upon either doing without it, becoming asexual, resorting to homosexuality, wanking, or, hooking. That's female arrogance, for you.
However, I do speak the truth. My wife always yelps in rhythmic motions, when we make love. I try very hard to please her. and her response is always the same: ahhhhh, ahhhh, ahhhhh, ahhhhh.
I can take my 3 fingers, and gently push against her privates. And, I then make circular motions. It's really a beautiful thing. However, ironically, I've learned that most females seem to prefer intercourse, even though that's not the most sexually stimulating act, for them. So, go figure. They receive more stimulus, while I'm 'performing various acts upon them'. BUt, they always prefer the more romantic act of 'love making'.
Okay, you may now judge this comment harshly
************
GODDESS HILIGHT
**************
Because they are NOT worshiping a deity in the form of a woman. Rather instead, the overall focus is upon women. For example: if you search Myspace for Goddesses, you'll quickly see, there's a total emphasis upon women. For example: I found one such profile which featured 60 pictures which were totally female-centric. And, yes, these photos celebrated all women as "Goddesses". Have you ever heard of the term "Diva". BUT, you don't need to take my word for it. Go, search for yourself.
***********
DIFFERENT PUNISHMENT for boys and girls.
*******
Adults use different methods of Punishment for Girls & BoysAn in-depth study concluded that adults tend to discipline boys & girls in a very different manner.
People use reasoning whenever dealing with girls.
Whereas, forceful-action is the standard method of disciplining boys.
Also, girls are rarely given consequence to their actions.
Rather instead, she is treated as a mature adult.
While, boys are often disciplined as if he's a mere child.
I've already dealt with the issue of corporal punishment on a separate blog.
**********************
THE VAWA ACT
*****************
Now, are you aware of the VAWA act? The Hippies are trying to make laws which are so vague, that they can literally get any man sent to prison for 10 years, just for arguing with a woman. Basically, they're trying to make every possible law, imaginable. But, once again, I ask: why do so many people think positively of them? The reason is because they often use Visual depictions of anti-war.
The Hippies are responsible for All oppression which is taking place in this country. They censor all beliefs which do not match their own. So, why do so many people support them? The reason is because, the Hippies give themselves alot of good press. SO, sleezebags ,such as yourself, have come to associate them with everything which is righteous.
The truth is simple: Hippies are stripping us our our basic liberties. (Example: Hippies prohibit us, by law, from flirting with one another.)
